During the preparations for the contest we asked ourselves whether we would like to award a prize through a jury or not.
In this context the question was raised who should be in this jury. Should we, because we are organising the contest? What else qualifies us to be the jury?
Moreover there was the question about possible criteria for " good " definitions. Is a "good" definition of inclusion one that matches the expectations of a jury?
To avoid both problems, we decided, that after the end of the contest, all definitions would be appraised by the registered users. One's own definitions can not be appraised.
In condensed form: You are the jury! (starting at 1.9.2009)To top of page